Business survey Netherlands; to sector/branches
Sector/branches (SBI 2008) | Margin | Seasonal adjustment | Periods | Factors limiting production Weather (%) | Factors limiting production Other factors (%) | Competitive position Inside the EU Competitive position improved (%) | Competitive position Inside the EU Competitive position remained unchanged (%) | Competitive position Inside the EU Competitive position declined (%) | Competitive position Inside the EU Not applicable (%) | Competitive position Inside the EU Balance competitive position (%) | Competitive position Outside the EU Competitive position improved (%) | Competitive position Outside the EU Competitive position remained unchanged (%) | Competitive position Outside the EU Competitive position declined (%) | Competitive position Outside the EU Not applicable (%) | Competitive position Outside the EU Balance competitive position (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 November | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 December | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 January | 0.8 | 7.1 | 6.8 | 75.1 | 12.0 | 6.1 | -5.3 | 6.4 | 69.4 | 7.5 | 16.7 | -1.0 |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 February | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 March | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 April | 0.4 | 1.3 | 4.5 | 80.9 | 7.7 | 6.9 | -3.2 | 0.0 | 78.2 | 4.6 | 17.2 | -4.6 |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 May | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 June | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 July | 6.8 | 4.3 | 5.4 | 77.6 | 10.9 | 6.1 | -5.5 | 0.5 | 79.8 | 9.1 | 10.6 | -8.6 |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 August | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 September | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 October | 3.6 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 78.2 | 10.6 | 8.5 | -7.9 | 3.1 | 73.6 | 4.5 | 18.8 | -1.4 |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 November | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 December | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 January | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 63.7 | 3.0 | 0.0 | -17.1 | 0.0 | 57.1 | 0.0 | 6.5 | -12.0 |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 February | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 March | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 April | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.9 | 72.3 | 1.6 | 0.2 | -9.5 | 0.0 | 67.4 | 0.0 | 7.0 | -9.3 |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 May | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 June | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 July | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 67.4 | 3.5 | 0.0 | -15.3 | 0.3 | 70.4 | 3.2 | 2.4 | -14.5 |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 August | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 September | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 October | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 68.6 | 3.5 | 1.2 | -15.2 | 0.0 | 63.2 | 0.6 | 9.0 | -6.3 |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 November | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 December | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 January | 1.2 | 15.1 | 13.3 | 86.5 | 21.0 | 12.6 | 6.5 | 12.9 | 81.7 | 15.7 | 26.9 | 10.0 |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 February | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 March | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 April | 1.4 | 2.1 | 6.1 | 89.5 | 13.8 | 13.6 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 89.0 | 9.3 | 27.4 | 0.1 |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 May | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 June | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 July | 15.0 | 8.4 | 11.1 | 87.8 | 18.3 | 12.2 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 89.2 | 15.0 | 18.8 | -2.7 |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 August | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 September | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
13-15 Man. of textile-, leatherproducts | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 October | 9.3 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 87.8 | 17.7 | 15.8 | -0.6 | 6.2 | 84.0 | 8.4 | 28.6 | 3.5 |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 November | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 December | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 January | 3.4 | 3.3 | 14.7 | 71.4 | 12.0 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 12.0 | 70.1 | 0.8 | 17.1 | 11.2 |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 February | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 March | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 April | 0.3 | 0.5 | 19.7 | 76.5 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 17.3 | 0.0 | 80.9 | 2.3 | 16.8 | -2.3 |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 May | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 June | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 July | 0.3 | 2.4 | 14.1 | 83.4 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 13.2 | . | . | . | . | 0.0 |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 August | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 September | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 October | 1.8 | 2.5 | 13.4 | 85.1 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 11.9 | 0.0 | 77.3 | 2.8 | 19.9 | -2.8 |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 November | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 December | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 January | 1.2 | 0.0 | 14.7 | 65.1 | 6.9 | 0.0 | -2.4 | 12.0 | 63.6 | 0.2 | 10.6 | 10.6 |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 February | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 March | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 April | 0.3 | 0.5 | 14.0 | 69.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.3 | 0.0 | 71.3 | 0.0 | 8.0 | -7.0 |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 May | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 June | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 July | 0.3 | 1.0 | 12.7 | 79.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.4 | . | . | . | . | -1.8 |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 August | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 September | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 October | 0.4 | 0.0 | 10.3 | 80.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 69.7 | 0.0 | 12.8 | -6.1 |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 November | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 December | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 January | 5.6 | 8.0 | 14.7 | 77.7 | 17.1 | 5.8 | 7.8 | 12.0 | 76.6 | 1.4 | 23.6 | 11.8 |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 February | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 March | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 April | 0.3 | 0.5 | 25.4 | 83.9 | 7.0 | 6.2 | 25.3 | 0.0 | 90.5 | 7.0 | 25.6 | 2.4 |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 May | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 June | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 July | 0.3 | 3.8 | 15.5 | 87.3 | 2.3 | 4.9 | 15.0 | . | . | . | . | 1.8 |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 August | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 September | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
15 Manufacture of leather and footwear | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 October | 3.2 | 5.4 | 16.5 | 89.4 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 16.8 | 0.0 | 84.9 | 6.1 | 27.0 | 0.5 |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 November | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 December | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 January | 0.0 | 3.8 | . | . | . | . | 1.6 | . | . | . | . | 0.4 |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 February | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 March | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 April | 0.0 | 3.4 | 7.8 | 86.0 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 5.3 | 10.8 | 82.9 | 1.1 | 5.2 | 9.8 |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 May | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 June | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 July | 0.1 | 7.3 | 9.6 | 81.6 | 1.1 | 7.7 | 8.4 | 12.7 | 73.2 | 4.9 | 9.2 | 7.8 |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 August | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 September | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Value | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 October | 3.1 | 6.6 | 6.4 | 71.5 | 11.8 | 10.3 | -5.3 | 10.5 | 63.1 | 14.5 | 11.9 | -4.1 |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 November | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 December | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 January | 0.0 | 0.0 | . | . | . | . | 1.2 | . | . | . | . | -1.4 |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 February | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 March | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 April | 0.0 | 0.3 | 5.1 | 76.6 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 70.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 May | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 June | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 July | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 69.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 60.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -5.1 |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 August | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 September | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 October | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 60.1 | 2.2 | 0.0 | -18.4 | 3.1 | 50.9 | 4.1 | 1.5 | -17.8 |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 November | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2023 December | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 January | 0.0 | 8.5 | . | . | . | . | 2.0 | . | . | . | . | 2.2 |
30 Manufacture of other transport | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | Original, unadjusted data | 2024 February | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Source: CBS. |
Table explanation
This table provides up-to-date information, including uncertainty margins, about the opinions held by Dutch entrepreneurs on their achievements, expectations and judgments regarding their business. This panel survey is aimed at gaining insight into the current situation, future development and judgments of Dutch enterprises. As a result it is possible to detect turning points in optimism or pessimism at an early stage, providing an early indication of possible trend changes in the economic activities of Dutch enterprises. Data are broken down by main business activity (SITC 2008). The questions submitted to the entrepreneurs at the beginning of a quarter concern output, turnover, prices, order books, stocks, investments, competitive position, economic climate, staff size and the obstacles they have encountered. In answering the questions relating to developments in the past three months and expectations for the next three months, the entrepreneurs are asked for a comparison with the preceding period of three months.
Data available from: January 2012
Status of the figures: All figures are definitive.
Changes as of November 6th 2024:
Figures of October 2024 have been added.
Due to a technical error figures for three of the topics are missing for October 2024 for both construction and all enterprises (no finance or energy). Figures for all other branches are available for these topics. It concerns the following topics:
- Turnover next year
- Workforce next year
- Expectations investments next year
Changes as of March 7th 2024:
Due to a technical issue most figures of February 2024 were divided by 100. This now has been corrected.
When will new figures be published?
Figures of November are expected to be published the 28th of November 2024.
Description topics
- Factors limiting production
- The weighted response rates to the question:
- "Our production/business experience barriers:
1 - no barriers,
2 - insufficient demand,
3 - shortage of labour force,
4 - shortages of production equipment, materials, commodities, (retail) space,
5 - financial constraints,
6 - weather conditions,
7 - other causes?"- Weather
- Weighted response rate of producers at the beginning of the quarter indicating that weather conditions is a limiting factor to meet the demand.
- Other factors
- Weighted response rate of producers at the beginning of the quarter indicating that other obstacles (like: to encounter strikes, work stoppages, penalties and the like) are a barrier for their activities.
- Competitive position
- The weighted response rates to the quarterly questions:
- "Has the competitive position of the enterprise on the domestic market improved, remained unchanged or declined in the last three months?"
- "Has the competitive position of the enterprise on the foreign market within the EU improved, remained unchanged or declined in the last three months?"
- "Has the competitive position of the enterprise on the foreign market outside the EU improved, remained unchanged or declined in the last three months?"- Inside the EU
- The weighted response rates to the quarterly question:
- "Has the competitive position of the enterprise on the foreign market within the EU improved, remained unchanged or declined in the last three months?"- Competitive position improved
- Weighted response rate of producers who reported that the competitive position of the enterprise on the foreign market within the EU has improved.
- Competitive position remained unchanged
- Weighted response rate of producers who reported that the competitive position of the enterprise on the foreign market within the EU remained unchanged.
- Competitive position declined
- Weighted response rate of producers who reported that the competitive position of the enterprise on the foreign market within the EU has declined.
- Not applicable
- The weighted response rate of producers who consider that the competitive position on the foreign market within the EU is not relevant for their enterprise plus the weighted response rate of producers who were not asked the question.
- Balance competitive position
- The weighted response rate of producers reporting that their competitive position on the foreign market within the EU has improved in a particular quarter minus the rate reporting that their position has declined. This balance reflects the development of competitive position on the foreign market within the EU in a particular quarter compared with the previous quarter.
- Outside the EU
- The weighted response rates to the quarterly question:
- "Has the competitive position of the enterprise on the foreign market outside the EU improved, remained unchanged or declined in the last three months?"- Competitive position improved
- Weighted response rate of producers who reported that the competitive position of the enterprise on the foreign market outside the EU has improved.
- Competitive position remained unchanged
- Weighted response rate of producers who reported that the competitive position of the enterprise on the foreign market outside the EU remained unchanged.
- Competitive position declined
- Weighted response rate of producers who reported that the competitive position of the enterprise on the foreign market outside the EU has declined.
- Not applicable
- The weighted response rate of producers who consider that the competitive position on the foreign market outside the EU is not relevant for their enterprise plus the weighted response rate of producers who were not asked the question.
- Balance competitive position
- The weighted response rate of producers reporting that their competive position on the foreign market outside the EU has improved in a particular quarter minus the rate reporting that their competive position has declined. This balance reflects the development of the competitive position on the foreign market outside the EU in a particular quarter compared with the previous quarter.